Ancient Greece

Greek vs Roman Sculpture: What’s the Difference, Really?

Ideal bodies and wrinkled faces, originals and copies: what really separates Greek from Roman sculpture, and what connects them.

Roman portrait bust of a man
Portrait bust of a man, Roman, mid-first century CE. Marble. The Metropolitan Museum of Art (12.233). Detail of the furrowed brow and strongly modelled face.Photo: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, CC0, via Wikimedia Commons
The short answer

Greek sculpture is mostly about the ideal body: gods, athletes and heroes shaped by rules of proportion. Roman sculpture is often about real people: portraits of citizens and emperors, sometimes with every wrinkle. But the two are tangled, because the Romans copied Greek statues on a huge scale, and many "Greek" statues in museums are in fact Roman copies.

Start with the purpose

Before comparing faces, ask what a statue was for. Greek sculpture mostly served religion and the city: statues of gods for temples, offerings in sanctuaries, athletes and grave monuments. Roman sculpture had those uses too, but also a strong social job. A Roman portrait told the viewer who a person was and what values he wanted to project, and it decorated houses, villas, baths and theatres as well as temples.

Greek: the ideal body

Classical sculptors such as Polykleitos built their figures on systems of proportion and balance, and gave gods and athletes bodies that no single person had. That is the Greek idea most people recognise. It is not the whole story: Hellenistic artists became interested in childhood, old age and even deformity, and made statues of fishermen, peasants and aged women. Greek art could be realistic when it chose to.

Roman: the real face

Roman portraiture has its own roots. Patrician families of the Roman Republic kept images of their ancestors, essentially death masks, in their homes. Republican portraits grew out of that tradition. The values that counted were public service, military courage and the authority that comes with age, so officials commissioned busts that showed every wrinkle and imperfection. Specialists call this style verism, from the Latin for “true”. A bust in the Metropolitan Museum, with its furrowed brow, piercing eyes, thin sealed lips and close-cropped military hair, shows the type; it was carved in the mid-first century CE, either copying a Republican portrait or reviving its style.

Roman portraiture did not stay veristic. Augustus combined the heroic idealisation of Hellenistic art with Republican likeness, and later dynasties swung between realistic and classicising faces to suit their politics. Hadrian was the first emperor to wear a beard in the Greek manner.

Greek bodies, Roman heads

The two traditions met in the same statue. Republican portraits were often heroic full-length figures with a generic, idealised body and a realistic head attached. Some Roman sculptures combine the image of a Greek god or athlete with a Roman portrait head, so that the meaning of the Greek type lent beauty, importance or a heroic air to the person portrayed.

Many “Greek” statues are Roman copies

As Rome expanded, its generals brought Greek works of art home as booty, and wealthy Romans soon wanted statues that evoked Greek culture. Greek and Roman workshops met the demand with copies of famous Greek statues, in marble and in bronze. Moulds were taken from the originals; solid plaster casts with many points of measurement guided the marble copies, which needed struts and tree-trunk supports because marble lacks the strength of bronze. By the second century CE the demand was enormous, from private homes to the niches of public baths and theatres.

Since most Greek bronzes were melted down, these copies are often our main evidence for the masterpieces of famous Greek sculptors. The marble Diadoumenos in the Metropolitan Museum, carved in the late first century CE, preserves a bronze by Polykleitos made some five centuries earlier. Some copies are exact, others are variants adapted to Roman taste, and some mix more than one Greek original.

Diadoumenos, restored Roman marble statue of a youth tying a ribbon round his head
Diadoumenos, Roman marble fragments after a Greek sculptural type by Polykleitos. The Metropolitan Museum of Art (25.78.56). The figure combines ancient fragments with modern cast restorations.Photo: Marie-Lan Nguyen, CC BY 2.5, via Wikimedia Commons

Neither was white

Greek and Roman statues alike were once colourful, painted and richly adorned, so the white marble of museums is misleading for both. Their settings mattered too: a statue in a temple, a bath or a family atrium was read differently.

So what is the difference?

Greek sculpture, above all in the Classical period, built the language of the ideal body. Roman sculpture adopted that language, copied it on a vast scale, and used it for Roman purposes, adding the realistic portrait that carried a person’s identity. Looking at a statue, ask whether it shows a type or a person, and whether it is an original or a copy: the answers often tell you more than the label “Greek” or “Roman”.

Where to see them

The Metropolitan Museum in New York shows Roman copies of Greek statues side by side with Republican and imperial portraits; the Vatican Museums, the museums of Rome and the National Archaeological Museum in Naples hold many of the most famous copies. Check opening times before you go.

Sources

  • The Metropolitan Museum of Art, Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History: “Roman Copies of Greek Statues” (2002); “Roman Portrait Sculpture: The Stylistic Cycle”; “Art of the Hellenistic Age” (2007).
  • The Metropolitan Museum of Art, collection records 12.233, 25.78.56 and 09.39; press release for Chroma: Ancient Sculpture in Color (2022).

Quick facts

Veristic bust
Roman. Bust of a man. Mid-1st century CE. Marble. H. 36.5 cm. New York, Metropolitan Museum of Art (12.233).
Diadoumenos
Roman, after Polykleitos. Diadoumenos. c. 69-96 CE. Marble. H. 185.4 cm. New York, Metropolitan Museum of Art (25.78.56).
Old Market Woman
Roman, after a Greek work of the 2nd century BCE. Statue of an old woman. 14-68 CE. Pentelic marble. H. 125.98 cm. New York, Metropolitan Museum of Art (09.39).